Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Narrator Analysis The Yellow Wallpaper Essays
Narrator Analysis The Yellow Wallpaper Essays Narrator Analysis The Yellow Wallpaper Essay Narrator Analysis The Yellow Wallpaper Essay Essay Topic: The Yellow Wallpaper The short story, ââ¬Å"The Yellow Wallpaperâ⬠, written by Charlotte Perkins Stetson, gives readers a first hand glimpse into the mind of a mentally disturbed woman fighting numerous and constant battles within herself and with others, one of them being post partum depression.The story is set in a historical period when it was typical for men to dominate over women.As illustrated in this story, the mentally disordered woman, possibly named Jane, is clearly at the mercy of her physician husband, John.He tells her what she can and cannot do, where she will sleep, and when she will take her medicine.Stetson consistently portrays the narrator as a progressively mentally disturbed woman that cannot seem to escape the thought that the wallpaper in her room takes on a life of its own while having some sort of power over her that she is not able to control.The unreliable narrator in ââ¬Å"The Yellow Wallpaperâ⬠piques unceasing curiosity while describing mo re and more detailed and subjective ways she is reaching total insanity; telling the story from a first person point of view makes this story much more captivating than if told in a third person limited type narrative. By the womanââ¬â¢s early admittance that she is suffering from a temporary nervous depression, she immediately establishes herself as an unreliable narrator.An unreliable narrator is specifically defined as a narrator, whether in literature, film, or theatre, whose credibility has been seriously compromised.She further proves her unreliability throughout the entire story with example after example of obvious escalation of her illness.At an early point in the story she states, ââ¬Å"if I were only well enough to writeâ⬠and ââ¬Å"I wish I could get well fasterâ⬠(Stetson 649). These statements disclose to us some definite characteristics of an unreliable narrator sinceshe is openly admitting to being unwell.At another point she proclaims, ââ¬Å"It is getting to be a great
Saturday, November 23, 2019
Why Students Hate Monday
Why Students Hate Monday Hashtag: #FelizLunes (Happy Monday) Thank God Its Friday Not Monday So what is #FelizLunes about? We frequently hear of TGIF or Thankà God its Friday but we seldom find people excited about Monday. In fact, lyrics of the Bob Geldofââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"I donââ¬â¢t like Mondaysâ⬠proposes thatâ⬠nobody gonna go to school todayâ⬠. The definition ââ¬Å"Manic Mondayâ⬠suggest that the day is commonly associated with depression, a feeling caused by the significant emotional pressure of coming to school or work. No wonder why the Bangles wished ââ¬Å"it were Sunday cause thatââ¬â¢s my fun dayâ⬠, Fleetwood Macââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"Monday Morningâ⬠see people ââ¬Å"look more like a zombie on Mondayâ⬠, and The Mamas The Papas are ââ¬Å"crying all of the timeâ⬠whenever Monday comes. A study of studentsââ¬â¢ perception of Monday morning suggests that their hesitation to come to school is not exactly about the day but the confusing and frustrating subjects scheduled on Monday. Others hate Monday because they need to wake up early, nothing interesting to do, and too tired from Sundayââ¬â¢s activities. WHY SOME STUDENTS HATE THEIR TEACHER? The difference between Monday and Friday according to literature disappear when someone developed a sense of personal growth or when work and life become inseparable. This model of personal growth and creativity suggest that students who hate Monday and seeing the difference between weekdayà and weekend, and school day and holiday are not yet interested in personal growth. The work-based model of education, which is generally to developed studentsââ¬â¢ natural growth and creativity in oneââ¬â¢s work, for instance, focuses on giving students the best professors, online resources, communication facility, and infrastructure where they can, in self-determined phase, collaborate, explore, and research. The Role of Teachers in Creating Happy Monday Most students hate the first day of school simply because Monday marked the end of the two enjoyable leisure day and beginning of long and challenging school week. However, Monday according to one article can be a day to look forward to if one can turn it into a less depressing day. Motivation plays an important role in TGIM or ââ¬Å"Thankà God Its Mondayâ⬠and for students, this is about looking forward to something enjoyable at school. For instance, a student who is really motivated about learning will wake up early and come to school Monday. In contrast, if the student is fearful of the classroom and more concern over his or her safety rather than education then Monday is a hateful day. Choices that students make and their drive to satisfy their needs for education are significantly affected by the school environment. For instance, a positive attitude towards learning can be developed by facilitating a learning environment that meets student needs. These include making the classroom an environment where mistakes are occasions of learning rather than opportunities for criticism. Classroom competition is also a motivational factor for adopting a more positive attitude for coming to school. Broadening the curriculum to include topics that interest students can improve a boring reading and writing classroom. Other motivating factors include a use of examples with which students can easily connect, an inclusion of more relevant reading materials, and studentsââ¬â¢ assignments with topics that they have not yet explored. Moreover, classroom activities that occasionally involved parents or members of the community can satisfy studentsââ¬â¢ social needs and eventually change their attitude towards learning positively.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
The Law of Personal Property Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words
The Law of Personal Property - Essay Example The reluctance of the courts to interfere with the terms of the contract has led to the development of rules which relate to the 'incorporation' (whether the clause is a part of the contract) and 'construction' (whether the clause covers the breach). The potential of the approach has been limited by the House of Lords. Incorporation requires any clause to have been incorporated as a term of the contract for it to be effective. Incorporation of clauses, most commonly limited liability clauses may take place through one of the three ways which will be briefly discussed. Firstly it can be through inclusion in the contractual document duly signed by the other party. (L'Estrange v Graucob1) Secondly the clause can be incorporate through provision of reasonable notice at or before the time of contract, so if notice is provided late it will stand void (Chapelton v. Barry UDC2). Finally the clause may be incorporate through a 'course of dealing', which is presumed when exclusion clause had been part of the previous contracts that had been made between the parties. (Kendall (Henry) & Sons v. Lillico (William) & Sons Ltd)3 After establishing the incorporation the next issue is that on proper construction the particular breach which has occurred is covered by the clause. (Andrews v. Singer4) The courts have stated that due to the statutory provisions there is a lesser need for adoption of strained constructions of clauses so as to limit their scope.( Lord Wilberforce in Photo Production Ltd v. Securicor Transport Ltd.) Further at one point in time the Court of Appeal had stated that an exclusion clause would not apply where a fundamental breach had taken place. A fundamental breach has been said to occur when either there has been a breach of a particularly important term or through a breach depriving then entirety of the benefits of the contract to the other party. The exclusion clauses are now regulated by the statutory framework that is Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977(UCTA). It is important to point out that the Act operates alongside the common law and so it remains open to strike down a clause through the rules of common law without the need to take into account the effect of the UCTA. This can be best explained by saying that an argument of incorporation of the clause into the contract can be raised. Thus it can be said that the validity of a clause is entirely dependent on both common law and the statutory controls that is UCTA and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999. The main or primary concern of Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 is to deal with the limitation and exclusion clauses and so it is not concerned with the unfair terms which are prevalent in a contract. The provisions are therefore essential concerned with business liability that the liabilities which arise in the course of a business. So if a private individual has laid down an exclusion clause then this would be subject to the common law rules which have been discussed. The course of business had been construed in R & B Customs Brokers v. UDT5 where it was found that certain contracts which are entered into by a business do not fall within the ambit of 'in the course of business' The different ways of limitation or exclusion of liability are found in s.13. Most of the provisions which have
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)